legal theorists = law is “what is” natural law theorists = “what law ought to be” law is about the separation of what is and what ought to be

legal theorists = law is “what is”
natural law theorists = “what law ought to be”

law is about the separation of what is and what ought to be. the legal system is a freestanding system of “what is” and does not need to point beyond itself to other moral systems to justify its independence and autonomous existence

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

natural law theorists believe that law is based on something beyond the legal system and that is morality

1 Critique
Austinian command theory of law
understood legal positivism as a command by a sovereign backed by the threat of sanctions to which people are generally obedient
no scope for morality because the theory is freestanding